<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ProCasts Blog &#187; flash player</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.procasts.co.uk/tag/flash-player/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.procasts.co.uk</link>
	<description>Professional Screencasts, Custom Voice-overs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:18:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Less than 90% adoption of .MP4-compatible Flash 9+10?</title>
		<link>http://blog.procasts.co.uk/2009/01/less-than-90-adoption-of-mp4-compatible-flash-910/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.procasts.co.uk/2009/01/less-than-90-adoption-of-mp4-compatible-flash-910/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 10:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian Ozsvald</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9.0.115]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camtasia 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camtasia 6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash player]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mp4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.procasts.co.uk/?p=36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In CamTasia 6 we are forced to use .mp4 as our web-friendly output format, this replaces the venerable .flv format from CamTasia 5 and earlier.  This has caused some upset in the forums.
I&#8217;ve already covered how to convert CamTasia 6 mp4 screencasts to flv, what concerns me is the availability of mp4-enabled players.  Do enough [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In CamTasia 6 we are forced to use <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mp4" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mp4?referer=');">.mp4</a> as our web-friendly output format, this replaces the venerable <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flv" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flv?referer=');">.flv</a> format from CamTasia 5 and earlier.  This has caused some <a href="http://forums.techsmith.com/showthread.php?t=9473" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/forums.techsmith.com/showthread.php?t=9473&amp;referer=');">upset</a> in the forums.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve already covered how to <a title="convert mp4 flv camtasia 6" href="http://blog.procasts.co.uk/2008/12/convert-camtasia-6-mp4-to-flv-using-ffmpeg/">convert CamTasia 6 mp4 screencasts to flv</a>, what concerns me is the availability of mp4-enabled players.  Do enough users have an mp4-compatible player?  If not, how many see nothing when presented with an mp4 screencast?  I&#8217;ve <a href="http://forums.techsmith.com/showthread.php?t=9942" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/forums.techsmith.com/showthread.php?t=9942&amp;referer=');">raised this question</a> in the TechSmith forums.</p>
<p>Troy Stein, CamTasia&#8217;s Product Manager, provided some <a href="http://forums.techsmith.com/showpost.php?p=30334&amp;postcount=6" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/forums.techsmith.com/showpost.php?p=30334_amp_postcount=6&amp;referer=');">explanation</a> but didn&#8217;t offer solutions.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;When we saw the results of MPEG4 output in our early CS 6 development work, we knew that FLV had a short shelf life. The MPEG4 files have better quality, often smaller file sizes, better playback on portable devices and produce faster than FLVs&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Currently over 98% of installed Flash players support Flash 7 and the FLV format (source: <a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/player_census/flashplayer/version_penetration.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.adobe.com/products/player_census/flashplayer/version_penetration.html?referer=');">Adobe Flash Player Version Penetration</a>, updated September 2008).  The same statistics show support for MP4 (via Flash Player v9.0.115 or better) is  <em>limited to 89%</em> of installed players.</p>
<p>This means that <em>11% of visitors cannot view MP4</em> content vs 2% of visitors who cannot view FLV content, as counted by Adobe.  The MP4-compatible version of Flash was released in 2007 (<a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Stewart/?p=501" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/blogs.zdnet.com/Stewart/?p=501&amp;referer=');">zdnet</a>) and had <a href="http://www.webkitchen.be/2008/07/12/hd-video-now-available-to-over-80-of-internet-connected-pcs/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.webkitchen.be/2008/07/12/hd-video-now-available-to-over-80-of-internet-connected-pcs/?referer=');">over 80% penetration</a> by July 2008.</p>
<p>Since Adobe&#8217;s statistics were recorded in September 2008 I wanted to see whether the results still held true now in January 2009.</p>
<p>I verified these statistics against real-world sites using December&#8217;s visitor count &#8211; I checked <a href="http://showmedo.com" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/showmedo.com?referer=');">ShowMeDo.com</a> (large screencast-based video education site, I&#8217;m a co-founder), <a href="http://ianozsvald.com" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/ianozsvald.com?referer=');">IanOzsvald.com</a> (my own blog, tech-savvy readers) and <a title="Professional Screencast creators" href="http://procasts.co.uk" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/procasts.co.uk?referer=');">ProCasts.co.uk</a> (this site) using the installed Google Analytics.</p>
<p>Monthly visitor counts are:</p>
<ul>
<li> ShowMeDo.com 100,000 (3 years+)</li>
<li> IanOzsvald.com 1,500 (3 years+)</li>
<li> ProCasts.co.uk 300 (6 months)</li>
</ul>
<p>Counting the percentage of visitors who have Flash Player 9.0.115 or better we see:</p>
<ul>
<li> ShowMeDo.com 86%</li>
<li> IanOzsvald.com 84%</li>
<li> ProCasts.co.uk 96%</li>
</ul>
<p>Using real-world sites that focus on a Western (US+European) tech-savvy audience we see that 85% of the majority of these visitors can see MP4-enabled content.  The other 15% probably can&#8217;t view the MP4 videos &#8211; they just see a link to the raw file or an error in Flash.  I&#8217;ll wager that many tech-focused sites see similar statistics &#8211; over 80% penetration but less than 90%.  If the tech-focused sites see less than 90%, how much worse does it get for general-folk-focused sites?</p>
<p>Possibly we follow <a href="http://forums.techsmith.com/showpost.php?p=30882&amp;postcount=13" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/forums.techsmith.com/showpost.php?p=30882_amp_postcount=13&amp;referer=');">jimb</a>&#8217;s solution and support two versions of the video simultaneously.  Alternatively we export using mp4 and <a title="convert mp4 flv camtasia 6" href="http://blog.procasts.co.uk/2008/12/convert-camtasia-6-mp4-to-flv-using-ffmpeg/">convert to flv</a> until these percentages improve.</p>
<p>Perhaps someone else has an alternative solution?</p>
<hr>
Ian is a professional screencaster (<a href="http://procasts.co.uk/examples.html" title="Professional screencasts and custom voice-overs" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/procasts.co.uk/examples.html?referer=');">ProCasts</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/procasts" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/twitter.com/procasts?referer=');">twitter</a>) and blogger (<a href="http://ianozsvald.com" title="Ian Ozsvald's blog" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/ianozsvald.com?referer=');">IanOzsvald.com</a>).]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.procasts.co.uk/2009/01/less-than-90-adoption-of-mp4-compatible-flash-910/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
